A New York Times investigation reveals that senior CFTC officials who raised internal objections to approvals involving Polymarket, Crypto.com, and Gemini were suspended or forced out. Separately, at least one official who intervened to push those approvals through subsequently took jobs at MoonPay and Gemini Titan. The pattern suggests a systematic removal of regulatory resistance during a critical period of crypto oversight.
This raises serious questions about the integrity of the regulatory process that governs crypto derivatives and prediction markets in the U.S. For investors, a captured or compromised regulator cuts both ways — it may accelerate approvals and reduce friction for crypto firms in the short term, but it also increases the risk of a political or legal backlash that could freeze the industry. Firms that benefited from these approvals — Gemini, Crypto.com, and Polymarket — face potential reputational and legal exposure.
Ongoing: Congressional oversight committees may request CFTC testimony or documents. Watch for any DOJ or Inspector General inquiry announcements. Next CFTC commissioner hearing dates to be confirmed in coming weeks.
Full analysis · Subscribers
The deep dive (bull case, bear case, and the data point that decides which side wins), the cause-and-effect chain behind the move, plain-English explainers for every block.
Aggregated reads dozens of sources in five languages and turns the day into plain-English cards like this one.
Educational analysis of public information, not investment advice. Report an error · Corrections policy
← Today's brief